As we’ve been reading Into the Wild, we have returned to one question again and again:
Now, I turn this question to you. Your first writing assignment of this session is an explanation/exploration of your own life. Chris McCandless realized that there was something amiss in his world, and he attempted to fix it. Whether he found his answers is not something we can ever know, but we can take the lens we’re using to study him and turn it on ourselves.
I ask that you write a piece on your own life. It may take the form of an analysis, a narrative, a treatise, even an anthem. Do some freewriting, look over your journals, create an outline of ideas (we’ll talk about this tomorrow), then decide which form would be best. I’ll talk with each of you individually about your outlines on Friday (13), so have a solid start by then.
Here are some questions you might consider (add more to the "Comments" section if you think of others more pertinent):
This is not a simple assignment, nor is it a chance for you to rant against the wrongs done to you, but an exploration of your aspirations and current situation. Remember, if we’ve learned anything so far,it’s this: When you’re heading into the wild, better have a map…
Here’s the outline so far. If you have a brilliant idea, post it below. We’ll continue discussion tomorrow.
B. Talks about normal life
(credit to LD for the title)
We’re gathering resources for our next synthesis question:
Read the following sources carefully. Then write an essay in which you develop a position on whether Lincoln Logs or Legos better promote creativity in children. Synthesize at least three of the sources for support.
Post your info on Lincoln Logs or Legos below. Remember, this is not an assignment for credit, but simply a chance for us to create our own question.
During the last three weeks of this session we will be pulling from everything we’ve done before: critical analysis of texts, cultural analysis of works, integration and synthesis of works from different eras and cultures, and explication of literary devices. "How will we do this?" you ask? By answering an apparently simple question:
What do Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Wilfred Owen’s "Dulce Et Decorum Est," H.G. Wells’s The Time Machine (and The Days of the Comet, and The Island of Dr. Moreau, and Conrad’s Heart of Darkness), the Danse Macabre, 1984, punk music (The Clash!), Twitter, Wikipedia, The Wisdom of Crowds, The Starfish and the Spider, DIY, Internet piracy, and podcasting have in common?
Our answer can be as simple and complex as we want, but it will take our understanding of all these cultural phenomena and works and the skills we’ve acquired this year to pull off a solid answer.
Now that’s a cumulative test.