Dear OYO-goers,
I’m getting a little too creative with what we should call ourselves, huh? This week we’re still meeting at Zink Park in the pavilion, but we’re up to binding books! Bring fancy paper if you’re not happy with regular copy paper. Other than that, supplies should be covered. So, come after school this Thursday the 30th to Zink for an awesome time of book-making. See you there.
Rachael
Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize | The White House. Comments Off on Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize | The White House
Heh. Science articles explained by The Guardian writer Martin Robbins:
This paragraph elaborates on the claim, adding weasel-words like “the scientists say” to shift responsibility for establishing the likely truth or accuracy of the research findings on to absolutely anybody else but me, the journalist.Read the whole article here:Â This is a news website article about a scientific finding | Martin Robbins | Science. Comments Off on This is a news website article about a scientific finding | Martin Robbins | Science | guardian.co.uk
Just a quick reminder:
You should spend most of your time working out the organization and collection of evidence, ensuring that each of your points have proper support. Email a copy of your outline to me this weekend; I’ll give you feedback if necessary. Once you have that squared away, make a copy of the outline file, rename it “rough draft,” and turn your major points into paragraphs, add an introduction and conclusion, transitions between the paragraphs, and you’re all set.
These rough drafts are due Monday. We’ll do a peer review then.
If you have questions at any point in this process, send me an email or post a comment below.
Progress reports went out today. Please let me know if you have any questions, but here are a few things to remember:
Please ignore the letter grade on the report. While it does reflect the average of your progress in class so far, that letter does not tell you what you should be working on. A person who has a fair grasp on all of the skills (3’s across the board) will have a 64%. A person who has mastered (a 5 in the gradebook) only two of the skills and all but ignored the other three (2’s in the gradebook) will have the same score. Please ignore the letter grade in the report; look to the gradebook for better information.
Still shocked by the D (64%)? If you are used to holding an A or B throughout the year, let go of that notion for this class. Your grades reflect your current mastery of skills that we will spend this semester working through. It is still early yet, so your grades are likely to be low. As a quick reminder, the following is the general rubric for all skills:
Not attempted | 0 |
Below basic | 2 |
Basic | 3 |
Proficient | 4 |
Mastery | 5 |
As I say when I pass back any assignment: You may rework anything I’ve graded. There will be no penalty for reworking; if you show better understanding, the grade in the gradebook will go up. You may also see me after 7:30 every morning (except late-start Thursdays), most lunch times, or anytime after school to show improved proficiency of a skill. Obviously, if you aren’t completing assignments or talking with me after class, your grade will suffer. But, if you are taking chances in your writing, participating in class discussions, asking questions, and discussing with me the problems you’re having, you should be fine.
We began this week’s discussion of ethos with a look at the corn industry’s (Corn Industry’s?) petition of the FDA to change the name of “high fructose corn syrup†to “corn sugar,†a name certainly more sweeter to the ear, if not the mouth ((Don’t hate me for that.)). Our discussion centered on SweetSurprise.com and the possible effects of the name change on the public’s perception of the ingredient.
On Tuesday we watched a bit of President Obama’s “town hall†speech in which the President defended a number of his administration’s economic policies and fielded questions from citizens. This event was quite fortuitous, as the argument he presented was primarily aimed at gaining trust and alleviating tension.
Today we watched a bit of former President Nixon’s “Checkers†speech as an imperfect comparison to the town hall meeting discussion on Tuesday. Your assignment tonight is to look through the transcript for appeals to ethos (described in the giant handout), note them, and come to class tomorrow prepared to discuss their efficacy.